To
be a radical centrist as I mean it does not mean trying to locate oneself at
some mid-point of an imagined right-left spectrum. The idea of such a spectrum along which everything must be placed as more or less Conservative or more or less Progressive (Liberal) is itself an idol that creates a sort of "conceptual trap" – a way of seeing things that so shapes the imagination that it is hard to imagine other ways of seeing.
To
ask if Jesus (and Christianity in general) is more compatible with American
Conservatism or American Progressivism (often called Liberalism) is like asking in China if
Christianity is more compatible with Confucianism or Taoism.
The
truth is there are ad hoc similarities between Christianity and both Taoism and
Confucianism. A Christian who converts from either of those might look back and
say; “Now I know what that means in the light of Christ” or “Oh, I need to
change my mind and behavior if I want to conform to Jesus.” In the end, Taoism
and Confucianism have a lot more in common with one another as varieties of the
Chinese heritage than either of them has with Christianity which
operates under a different logic.
The
same is true for the socio-political ideologies of Conservatism and
Progressivism which shape the way their adherents engage the world in ways analogous to religious faith. Both are rooted in Classical Western
Liberalism (which is why I am using "Progressive" rather than the
more common "Liberal" to identify one of its sub-traditions). In this
sense, what we usually call “Conservative” is part of this Liberal Tradition as
much as what we usually call “Liberal” or “Progressive.” As part of this Liberal
Tradition, both Conservatives and Progressives share these tendencies:
* Fetishizing the individual as autonomous and independent
* Fetishizing the modern nation-state as the fundamental and ultimate
socio-political reality to which final allegiance is given.
* Making faith primarily a private, personal matter rather than a matter of allegiance to the body of the Church.
* Making faith primarily a private, personal matter rather than a matter of allegiance to the body of the Church.
* Infatuation with the notion of abstractions, e.g., love, justice, freedom,
reason etc, as universally accessible and independent of traditions or
particular communal histories and practices.
Given
these similarities, from a Christ-centered perspective, ideological
Conservatism and ideological Progressivism do not so much occupy opposite poles
of a spectrum as they are more like points on contiguous sections of a dart
board – like sections 16 and 7 – more or less removed from the center if the center is Jesus Christ.
To
be clear, the point here is not that the heritage of Classical Western Liberalism is altogether bad, whether in its conservative or progressive
manifestations. Doubtless there is good in that heritage, e.g., the breaking
down of a fixed class system, moving toward the social equality of women, the
acceptance of ideological and religious diversity, and things like the freedom
of the press. Just as there are things about Taoism and Confucianism a Christian
can embrace, there are things about the Liberal Tradition in both its more
Conservative and it more Progressive forms Christians can embrace. Several of
the things just mentioned actually have roots or antecedents in Christianity. And,
all things considered, the Liberal Tradition is preferable to illiberal approaches to politics, e.g., Authoritarianism, Fascism, Marxism,
ethno-nationalism.
Being
a Centrist does not mean trying to be neutral or unengaged with the world around us. Jesus was neither. And centered
Christians will have sympathies one way or another. But, we need to be wary of
investing too much emotional energy or loyalty in political parties, movements,
and ideologies lest our allegiance to them compromise our allegiance to Christ
and inhibit our ability to love our neighbor.
If
Christians are not suspicious of these loyalties, we will again and again fall into the
trap of trying to fit Jesus and Christianity into those loyalties. The result
is a fractured and compromised Church with no witness. The religious right
seeks to make God, Jesus, and Christianity safe for conservative values. The
religious left seeks to
make God, Jesus, and Christianity safe for progressive values. The one ends up
playing servile chaplain to the red states while the other plays servile
chaplain to the blue states. And both end up more or less the chaplains of
American Civil Religion. In their utter conformity, neither has a truly
prophetic witness centered in what God has done and is doing through Jesus
Christ and the Holy Spirit. Because both are content to repeat the prejudices
of this world, neither is able to bear witness to the New Creation.
Wary of being drawn off Christ the center, radical Christian centrists will engage Conservatism and Progressivism both
critically and sympathetically – seeking
such ad hoc congruities as might be found. But it will not accept a view of the
world in which they are poles on a spectrum along which Christians must place
themselves.
Previous: Centered on Jesus I: Introduction/Not Moderate
Next: Centered on Jesus III: Jerome the Ciceronian
Previous: Centered on Jesus I: Introduction/Not Moderate
Next: Centered on Jesus III: Jerome the Ciceronian
No comments:
Post a Comment