At
the end of the 1700's, France was in a bad way. Most people lived in abject
poverty while the aristocratic few lived lives of luxury. The wealthy had all
the power and used it to oppress the masses. Injustice was rife. To make
matters worse, the church seemed to be in league with the aristocracy and
supported their “divine right” to rule. A movement arose to oppose
this situation. That
movement led to the French Revolution.
One of the French Revolution's leaders was an idealistic young man named Maximilien Robspierre. He desired to turn things upside-down, to right the wrongs, to bring justice to the people. The Revolution did indeed turn things upside-down. The old, unjust regime was overthrown and a new one set up in its place. The new regime was to be founded on reason, justice, liberty, equality, and humanity.
One of the French Revolution's leaders was an idealistic young man named Maximilien Robspierre. He desired to turn things upside-down, to right the wrongs, to bring justice to the people. The Revolution did indeed turn things upside-down. The old, unjust regime was overthrown and a new one set up in its place. The new regime was to be founded on reason, justice, liberty, equality, and humanity.
But,
after only a couple of years, things began to go terribly wrong. The Reign of
Terror began as one faction battled another and each sought to eliminate any
opposition, real or imagined, against the new government. Robspierre was one of
the instigators of the Reign of Terror. It was a long way from the dream of “liberté, égalité, fraternité”. Eventually, Robspierre himself became a
victim of the Terror, executed on the guillotine. He had intended good. He had intended
justice. But evil was close at hand. In the name of justice and other ideals he perpetrated great cruelty and injustice. So has it been with the good intentions of
every revolution since. And so it has been with every opposition to revolution
since.
This
story gets at what I think Paul is on about in the seventh chapter of his
letter to the church in Rome:
I do not understand my own actions. For I do not
do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate. Now if I do what I do not want,
I agree that the law is good. But in fact it is no longer I that do it, but sin
that dwells within me. For I know that nothing good dwells within me, that is,
in my flesh. I can will what is right, but I cannot do it. For I do not do the
good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do. Now if I do what I do not
want, it is no longer I that do it, but sin that dwells within me.
Paul
is not just pointing out a moral truism about our weak wills. This is not, “I
didn’t intend to eat that last slice of cheesecake, but then I did” or “I meant
to get up early and go to the gym, but turned off the alarm and decided to
sleep in instead.” No, our problem, as Paul sees it, is more serious than that. Is it
the more serious idea that God demands perfect obedience to the
law, but we are incapable of that perfection and thus under judgment? I do not
think it is that either. Paul sees our problem as more radical and serious than
even that.
So
what is Paul saying here? To get at that, we need to know what question he is
trying to answer. In verse 7, Paul asks, “What then should we say? That the law is sin?” That's the question
Paul is trying to answer here. Paul had proclaimed freedom from the law.
Therefore, some might think he believes the law to be bad. He was in fact
accused of saying this. Is the law sin? “By no means,” Paul answers.
He believed the same God who sent Jesus also gave the law – not some abstract
moral rule, but the Torah of Israel. The Torah was the good gift of the
gracious God of the Jewish people – Paul's people – showing them the way of faithfulness. What troubled Paul was that even the law
turned out to be subject to sin. The law, given as a corrective to human
sinfulness, had turned out to be subject to sin just like everything else. Sin
proved more powerful than the law, such that the law was incapable of saving us
from our bondage to sin.
Our
problem, according to Paul, is not just that, because of our weakness, we
cannot keep the Torah. Elsewhere, he boldly claims to have been blameless in
obeying the Torah (See Philippians 3:6). Paul was not burdened by a guilty
conscience due to his weak will or his inability to sufficiently obey the law. The
problem was that his very devotion to the Torah, had led him to oppose God’s will. Even when he was most zealous in pursuing what he was sure was God’s will, evil got the upper hand and led to the very opposite. He was zealous for the Torah. In his zeal, he had
signed up to oppose those who he thought were corrupting the people and leading
them away from the Torah and from God. He set out to stop the new Jesus movement
which he was convinced was opposed to the way of God. But, on his way to
Damascus to deal with followers of that movement, something happened. The risen
Jesus appeared to him and asked, “Why do you persecute me?” That
knocked Paul of his horse and began the rearranging of his thinking. He was now
convinced that Jesus was the key to God's plan. That meant that the very thing
he had been opposing on behalf of God's law turned out to be the very fulfillment
of God's law (see The Way of the Slaughtered Lamb – The Way of Love). The problem as Paul sees it is that sin is so radical and
pervasive that even the Torah itself – the very gift of God – can be turned
against God. He found “sin working death in me through what is good.”
The
problem is not that we can’t satisfy the accounting office in heaven. That is
obvious enough. And faithful Jews like Paul had means of addressing that and found the assurance of forgiveness within
the Torah itself. The problem is that sin is so pervasive that we are unable to
extricate ourselves from its effects even when we obey the law. “We are sold into slavery under
sin.” Our problem is not that we are not obedient enough. Our problem is
that we are in bondage to selfishness and sin which permeate everything, including our pursuit of faithfulness or justice or freedom or peace, even our love – everything.
“I find it a law that when I want to do what is good, evil lies close at hand.” That is the key phrase in Romans 7 (and a key phrase in the whole New Testament) which clues us in to the point Paul is making. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. But that is not for the reason we usually think. It is not that I don't get around to following through with my intentions. It is that, even in my best intentions – when I am quite sure I am right and pursuing God’s will, pursuing holiness or justice or love – evil lies close at hand. That is because God’s will, ultimately, is that we love with the indiscriminate and perfect love with which God loves us. But, our love is always infected and warped, always corrupted by selfishness, insecurity, anxiety, ignorance, willfulness, inattentiveness, etc.
“I find it a law that when I want to do what is good, evil lies close at hand.” That is the key phrase in Romans 7 (and a key phrase in the whole New Testament) which clues us in to the point Paul is making. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. But that is not for the reason we usually think. It is not that I don't get around to following through with my intentions. It is that, even in my best intentions – when I am quite sure I am right and pursuing God’s will, pursuing holiness or justice or love – evil lies close at hand. That is because God’s will, ultimately, is that we love with the indiscriminate and perfect love with which God loves us. But, our love is always infected and warped, always corrupted by selfishness, insecurity, anxiety, ignorance, willfulness, inattentiveness, etc.
The
Church rightly intended the good of defending the truth of the Gospel. But,
doing so it resorted to unmerciful actions, e.g., the Inquisition, the Albigensian Crusade, collusion with colonialism, that actually contradicted its Lord who ordered us to love our enemies
and to be as perfect in mercy as is the One who he called Father. And as the story
about Robspierre shows, this is not just a religious problem. In the pursuit of
justice, the French Revolution and others (Russian, Chinese, Cuban, Cambodian,
etc.) have become the very injustice they set out to redress. In the name of
freedom and security, America and other democracies have too often thwarted the
freedom of other people and brought insecurity to other nations. Closer to home, how often have we found our
intention to love those near and dear to us has been experienced as problematic by the very ones we wanted to love? Or how often has our zeal for obeying God,
pursuing the truth or justice, led us to treat others with something short of
mercy, patience, fairness, or generosity?
It appears to be a law of humanity, bound by sin, that when we want to do what is good, evil lies close at hand. We are slaves to that law which is the law of sin. That law is more powerful than the law of the Torah. We cannot save ourselves or deliver ourselves from this law. No amount of positive thinking, higher consciousness, or beefed up will-power can save us. We don't just need a better example of love. We don't just need better knowledge. We don't just need stronger wills. We don't just need the assurance of God's love, fundamental though that is. We are “sold into slavery under sin.” We are unable to free ourselves from our bondage. We cannot rescue ourselves. We need saving from outside ourselves. That might well lead to despair. “Wretched man that I am! Who will rescue me?”
It appears to be a law of humanity, bound by sin, that when we want to do what is good, evil lies close at hand. We are slaves to that law which is the law of sin. That law is more powerful than the law of the Torah. We cannot save ourselves or deliver ourselves from this law. No amount of positive thinking, higher consciousness, or beefed up will-power can save us. We don't just need a better example of love. We don't just need better knowledge. We don't just need stronger wills. We don't just need the assurance of God's love, fundamental though that is. We are “sold into slavery under sin.” We are unable to free ourselves from our bondage. We cannot rescue ourselves. We need saving from outside ourselves. That might well lead to despair. “Wretched man that I am! Who will rescue me?”
Paul's
reply is, “Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!” Christ
comes to rescue us from our slavery under sin. In his life, death, and resurrection Christ breaks through our
bondage. Christ comes to rescue us from the power of sin. Christ comes to
rescue us from our own good intentions – and those of others. Christ invites us to a different kind of freedom, the freedom to
follow him ever more deeply into the heart of God who is Love. He invites us to allow his Spirit transform us into his likeness and enable us to be about the mission of the kingdom of
God. He only asks that we allow him to have his way with us by the power of his
Spirit. In Jesus there is forgiveness for our inability to live into the way of love and truth and justice for which we were created. In him we can find healing for the deep brokenness that keeps us from God and one another and from ourselves.
Paul points us to Jesus and the cross where there is salvation. He warns us of the evil that lies close at hand even in our best intentions. This reminds us to live with humility, holding even our firmest convictions about what is right and true and just – even our firmest convictions about God’s will – a little more lightly lest we fall into the merciless evil that is always close at hand in our every good intention. We must still act. We must still pursue the right the good and the true. We must still seek to love God and neighbor. But we must do so always humbly remembering sins tendency to corrupt our every good intention.
Paul points us to Jesus and the cross where there is salvation. He warns us of the evil that lies close at hand even in our best intentions. This reminds us to live with humility, holding even our firmest convictions about what is right and true and just – even our firmest convictions about God’s will – a little more lightly lest we fall into the merciless evil that is always close at hand in our every good intention. We must still act. We must still pursue the right the good and the true. We must still seek to love God and neighbor. But we must do so always humbly remembering sins tendency to corrupt our every good intention.
Still
more, we are called to remember, as Paul encourages us to remember in the following chapter of Romans, that once God has a hold of us, it is no longer
about our good intentions, or our ability to be faithful to the law or anything
else. It is about the faithfulness of Jesus. And his hold on us is always greater
than our hold on him. However radical and pervasive sin is, the grace of God in Jesus Christ is still more radical and more pervasive.
“Thanks
be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! ”
A sermon from Fleming Rutledge helped me with this difficult text. A recording of the sermon can be found here: http://nationalpres.org/frodo-and-free-will
ReplyDeleteThanks. I'll give it a listen. I am fond of Rutledge.
ReplyDelete