Wednesday, April 29, 2026

The Impossibility of Religious Pluralism

This Sunday's Gospel lesson from the Revised Common Lectionary includes Jesus saying, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). It is something that some of a more liberal or progressive bent find troubling. But is is a central claim of Christianity. I suggest that this claim and others like it actually point to something we cannot get around. Christians cannot get around it if the want to be faithful. But, in the end, everyone believes something like this. If it is is not Jesus, it will be something else.

In the 20th century, there was a great religious leader who also became a great political leader. After some time in exile, he returned to lead the people of his country as they threw off their oppressors and the forces that threatened their cultural integrity. When he died, the whole nation was frantic with grief. The leader’s name? It could be Mahatma Gandhi, the spiritual founder of modern India. But, Ayatollah Khomeini, the spiritual father of the current Iranian theocracy, also fits the profile. He remains in very high esteem, not only in Iran, but throughout the Muslim world.

Can we say that both these religious and political leaders had equally valid and appealing grasps on the nature of the divine and what it means to be human? Or that either’s guess was as good as the other’s when it came to pointing to the ineffable, the sacred, or the holy? Will we not inevitably credit one more than the other? On what basis? Their respective effects on American foreign policy? The degree to which their words and actions comport with certain intellectual currents in the West? How they conform to our own priorities, preferences, and prejudices? Our individual taste?

The Mahatma or the Ayatollah. If we prefer one over the other, it will be based on something. Nobody actually in practice accords all religions and all religious or ethical teaching equal respect. Everyone uses some standard by which to measure their merits – our cultural/political/class/national/spiritual prejudices and convictions etc. There is a presumed superiority in whatever standard we use and however conscious or unconscious its application. Something will be trump.

It is no more presumptuous for Christians to say that we measure Gandhi and Khomeini and everything else against the example of Jesus Christ because we understand him to be the definitive revelation of the divine-human drama than to use something else as the measure.

The earliest Christian creed was “Jesus is Lord,” i.e., Jesus is the true standard, the one to whom allegiance is owed, and the key to understanding God. It also meant that it was through Jesus that the contradictions and tragedies of human existence would eventually be resolved. It had to be declared. It had to be lived. It had to be, if it came to it, died for. Because it was true. If Jesus was just one among many “spirit persons,” even though a particular favorite, he could not – cannot – be Lord. And there would be little point in paying him any more attention than Spartacus or Socrates. Nor would there be any conflict between worshipping God and worshipping Caesar. To claim Jesus as Lord means that everything else, personal preferences, familial traditions, political ideologies, national loyalties, other religious teachings – everything – is measured in light of what we know of God and life in light of the life, teaching, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

This does not mean that there is no truth or wisdom to be learned elsewhere. One can hold emphatically that Jesus is uniquely Lord and still believe that the Holy Spirit sings in and through the hearts and scriptures of those who do not acknowledge him as Lord. Listening carefully and respectfully to their wisdom can be edifying. I have read widely the teachings of other faiths and philosophical traditions and learned from them. 

Nor does claiming Jesus is the way the truth and life necessarily mean everyone who does not acknowledge that that is going to hell. It is possible to hold that no one comes to the Father (the ultimate Good) except through Jesus and remain a hopeful universalist (see Gollum's Choice or, What is Your Precious? Some thoughts on Judgment and Hell).

We lose something essential when we abandon the scandal of particularity that is the declaration that Jesus is Lord. If we are faithful to Jesus, we will do so with reverence, with gentleness, with humility, with forbearance, with curiosity, and with hospitality toward those of other faiths. But we will still bear witness to that truth and invite others to enter into the truth that Jesus is.

While there are certainly similarities across faith traditions, there are also fundamental, meaningful, and irreconcilable differences. Even to say that they are all about love is an assumption. And it obscures the fact that love is defined quite differently across religions. Not all faiths, for example, insist on loving one’s enemies.

Religions are based on metaphysical claims that ground and give meaning to their worship and ethics. To gloss over those differences and their importance is no way to respectfully engage them. And it betrays a modern agnostic bias.

It is also the case that each religion contains wide, sometimes contradictory differences. Ayatollah Khomeini does not represent all Muslims. His contemporary, Anwar Sadat, was a faithful Muslim and a different kind of leader. He was assassinated by other Muslims in 1981 because of his pursuing peace with Israel. Mahatma Gandhi does represent all Hindus. He was assassinated by another Hindu because of his efforts to foster peace between Hindus and Muslims. Each faith tradition has considerable diversity of belief and practice within it. It is also the case that it is not hard to find examples of Christians who claim Jesus as Lord and do not do what he tells them (Luke 6:46) or walk in love as he loved us (Ephesians 5:2). But hat only means they fall short of the Christian ideal. It does not invalidate the ideal.

I am concerned that in our reaction to simplistic, heavy-handed fundamentalism, we do not slip into a simplistic religious pluralism that has more to do with the intellectual agnosticism of modernity than with Christian witness to the mystery of God. We can slip into a false humility that says something like, “There are many of ways to understand or of entering into the reality of God” while  actually judging their final legitimacy based on whether they affirm of offend things we consider non-negotiable. It is a false humility because it is not as humble or generous as it sounds. There is still judgement. There is the hidden hubris of presuming to know what the criteria are for adjudicating which teachings of any faith are better than others. Those criteria are not neutral. They are based on other preconceptions – the flotsam and jetsam of the religious, philosophical, and political prejudices of our age.

This is important because we do live in societies with a plurality faiths and philosophies. Embracing religious plurality is not the same as the ideology of religious pluralism. Religious plurality can be a good thing if we seek to truly understand one another and are willing together in harmony. But acknowledging and respecting the very real differences is a better place to start than assuming or imposing a sameness.

There is no getting around it. We all stand somewhere whether we acknowledge it or not ad we evaluate everything based on that. It is just a question of how honest we are about it. And how generous and hospitable we are towards those committed to other ways of believing and being.

See also: What I said at the Mosque

Monday, April 27, 2026

Anglicanism is . . . 12. Committed to the Pursuit of Holiness

“Holiness” is one of those churchy concepts that has negative connotations for lots of people. It conjures images of rigid people who look like they’ve been sucking on raw persimmons tut-tutting anyone who looks like they might be having fun. It is often presented as following a set of stultifying rules and minding your p’s and q’s, emphasizing lesser things at the expense of “the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith” (Matthew 23:23). And too often it has been used to insist that some people deny parts of themselves not as a living sacrifice for the sake of their souls but as a soul-killing sacrifice of death for the sake of narrow ways of understanding God and humanity. But it need not mean those things. Rother it is a serious call to an uncompromising orienting of all that we are and all that we have to the double love of God and neighbor.

Holiness in fact is a deeply Anglican commitment. One of our great early theologians, Jeremy Taylor wrote two influential books on the topic in the 17th century. In the same century, “the most popular book of devotion England has known,” ‘The Whole Duty of Man’ was published anonymously. Benjamin Franklin commended that book to his daughter. In the 18th century, William Law wrote ‘A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life,’ another work that proved hugely influential. It had a profound impact on John Wesley. Other Anglicans like R. C. Ryle, J. I Packer, and Rowan Williams have written important works explicitly on the topic. Others Anglican writers, like Evelyn Underhill, have not written explicitly on the topic, but their works are soaked with it. We cannot reject the idea of holiness without rejecting something fundamental to the Anglican way. But how we understand the concept matters.

“Almighty God, by our baptism into the death and resurrection of your Son Jesus Christ, you turn us from the old life of sin: Grant that we, being reborn to new life in him, may live in righteousness and holiness all our days; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.”
Book of Common Prayer (1979), Collect for Baptism

“If anyone thinks that Christians regard unchastity as the supreme vice, he is quite wrong. The sins of the flesh are bad, but they are the least bad of all sins. All the worst pleasures are purely spiritual: the pleasure of putting other people in the wrong, of bossing and patronising and spoiling sport, and back­biting; the pleasures of power, of hatred. For there are two things inside me, competing with the human self which I must try to become. They are the Animal self, and the Diabolical self. The Diabolical self is the worse of the two. That is why a cold, self-­righteous prig who goes regularly to church may be far nearer to hell than a prostitute. But, of course, it is better to be neither.”
– C. S. Lewis (1898-1963), Mere Christianity

“By a hideous irony, our shrinking reprobation of [sexual] sin has made us too delicate so much as to name it, so that we have come to use for it the words which were made to cover the whole range of human corruption. A man may be greedy and selfish; spiteful, cruel, jealous, and unjust; violent and brutal; grasping, unscrupulous, and a liar; stubborn and arrogant; stupid, morose, and dead to every noble instinct- and still we are ready to say of him that he is not an immoral man. I am reminded of a young man who once said to me with perfect simplicity: ‘I did not know there were seven deadly sins: please tell me the names of the other six.’”
 – Dorothy Sayers (1893-1957), The Other Six Deadly Sins from Creed or Chaos? [The other six Deadly Sins according to Christian tradition are Gluttony, Greed, Sloth, Envy, Anger, Pride]

“The order of purging is according to the seven deadly sins of the formal tradition of the Church. The Church is not a way for the soul to escape hell but to become heaven; it is virtues rather than sins which we must remember.”
– Charles Williams (1886-1945), The Figure of Beatrice

“It is extraordinary how little the New Testament says about God’s interest in our success, by comparison with the enormous amount that it says about God’s interest in our holiness, our maturity in Christ, and our growth into the fullness of His image.”
– J. I. Packer (1926-2020), Rediscovering Holiness: Know the Fullness of Life with God

“The best theology is rather a divine life than a divine knowledge.”
– Jeremy Taylor (1613-1667), Via Intelligentiae

“They that will with profit make use of the instruments of virtue, must so live as if they were always under the physician’s hand. . . they must be used like nourishment, that is by daily care and medication; not like a single medicine, and upon the actual pressure of present necessity.”
– Jeremy Taylor (1613–1667), Holy Living

“It is necessary that every man should consider, that since God hath given him an excellent nature, wisdom and choice, an understanding soul and an immortal spirit, having made him lord over the beasts and but a little lower than the angels; He hath also appointed for him a work and a service great enough to employ those abilities, and hath also designed him to a state of life after this, to which he can only arrive by that service and obedience.”
– Jeremy Taylor (1613–1667), Holy Living

“It is sure God hath given these promises to no other end, but to invite us to holiness of life; yea, he gave his Son, in whom all his promises are as it were summed up, for this end. We usually look so much at Christ’s coming to satisfy for us, that we forget this other part of his errand. But there is nothing surer than that the main purpose of his coming into the world is to plant good life among men.”
The Whole Duty of Man (1658), Anonymous

“If you will here stop and ask yourselves why you are not as pious as the primitive Christians were, your own heart will tell you, that it is neither through ignorance nor inability, but purely because you never thoroughly intended it.”
– William Law (1686–1761), A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life

“Would you know who is the greatest saint in the world? It is not he who prays most or fasts most; it is not he who gives most alms or is most eminent for temperance, chastity or justice; but it is he who is always thankful to God, who wills everything that God wills, who receives everything as an instance of God’s goodness and has a heart always ready to praise God for it. Could you therefore work miracles, you could not do more for yourself than by this thankful spirit, for it turns all that it touches into happiness.”
– William Law (1686-1761), A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life

“Because Holiness has entered our world, and appeared in our nature, we know that men and women can become holy; and are bound, in spite of all discouragements, to take an optimistic view of human life. The Church is an undying family which has its face set towards Holiness, and is fed upon the food which can – if we let it – produce Holiness.”
– Evelyn Underhill (1875-1941), The School of Charity

“The spiritual life is a stern choice. It is not a consoling retreat from the difficulties of existence; but an invitation to enter fully into that difficult existence, and there apply the Charity of God and bear the cost.”
– Evelyn Underhill (1875-1941), The School of Charity

“Every Christian communicant volunteers for translation into the supernatural order, and is self-offered for the supernatural purposes of God. The Liturgy leads us out towards Eternity, by way of the acts in which [people] express their need of God and relation to God. It commits every worshipper to the adventure of holiness, and has no meaning apart from this. In it the Church shows forth again and again her great objective; the hallowing of the whole created order and the restoration of all things in Christ. The Liturgy recapitulates all the essentials in this life of sanctification — to repent, to pray, to listen, to learn; and then to offer upon the altar of God, to intercede, to be transformed to the purposes of God, to be fed and maintained by the very life of God.”
– Evelyn Underhill (1875-1941), The Mystery of the Sacrifice

“We in ourselves are fragile, fugitive things, faulty, clumsy vessels which yet can be used to hold an unearthly treasure: shrines which are nothing in themselves, but can become homes of the Holy Spirit, Lord and Giver of Life. The New Testament is full of this idea. Let us consider ourselves from this point of view. It will mean revising a good many of our ordinary ideas before we have done: more and more emphasis on God and his love, less and less upon ourselves.”
– Evelyn Underhill (1875-1941), The Fruits of the Spirit

“Repentance does not merely mean giving up a bad habit. What it is concerned with is the mind; get a new mind. What mind? The mind of Christ ―our standard of reference; learn to look at the world in His way. To repent is to adopt God’s viewpoint in place of your own. There need no be any sorrow about it. In itself, far from being sorrowful, it is the most joyful thing in the world, because when you have done it you have adopted the viewpoint of truth itself, and you are in fellowship with God. It means a complete re-evaluation of things we are inclined to think good. The world, as we live in it, is like a shop window into which some mischievous person has got overnight, and shifted all the price-labels so that the cheap things have the high price-labels on them and the really precious things are priced low. We let ourselves be taken in. Repentance means getting those price labels back in the right place.
– William Temple (1881-1944), Christian Faith and Life

“Personal indulgence is a poor preparation for the difficult experiment of fraternity. . . For fellowship is the hardest of adventures. It can only be achieved by people far advanced in self-subordination, in whom the impulse of unregenerate human nature to have its own way has been supplanted by the carefully developed intuition of the Whole. The old interior training of the Christian life was admirably adapted to further this end. It produced unselfish and self-controlled people; if it is tossed on the scrap-heap and replaced with easy-going practices and a defiant claim to follow one’s own will, any community will make ship-wreck.”
– Vida Dutton Scudder (1861-1954), Social Teachings of the Christian Year

“The spiritual wisdom of the Church Catholic has taught, indeed, the supreme importance of personal holiness. To this end she has enjoined keen self-searching; penitence, confession, reparation; the yearning of the soul toward personal communion with the living God. . . Social morals must always be founded on individual virtue. To attain this virtue man must examine himself straitly, must know the agony of self-abasement, must recognize his failures, and must seek inspiration in the arduous struggle through placing his own life beside the highest he knows. The drama of the inner life must be eternal, whether that drama pass beneath a cloud earth-born or open to the spiritual heavens.”
– Vida Dutton Scudder (1861-1954), The Witness of Denial

“The simple but important point to be made, then, is that the Christian life – faith, hope and love; the transformation of the ordinary, mundane and humane; the turn from self-enclosedness toward God and neighbor – is not an inhibiting, externally or internally imposed self-discipline; instead, it is identical with, indeed it is the gift of liberty in and by God the Spirit.

Most of us know what this means in the Christian life of interpersonal relations. In all their many varieties, there is nonetheless a similarity about the ways Christian people are disposed toward others, Christians and nonChristians alike; there is a quiet and nonoppressive dedication to the good of other human beings for their own sake under God.”
– Hans Frei (1922-1988), On the Thirty-Nine Articles in Unpublished Pieces: Transcripts from the Yale Divinity School archive edited by Mike Higton

“Christian holiness consists not of trying as hard as we can to be good but of learning to live in the new world created by Easter, the new world we publicly entered in our baptism.”
– N. T. Wright (1948 - ), Surprised by Hope
“The only excuse for writing about holiness or about holy lives is something to do with . . . a way of pointing to those lives in which something 'works', some wholeness comes through; lives that come across like a brilliant performance of the music or drama of God's action. It helps to notice and think about this or that detail, this or that transition, even if you recognise how far you are from realising it yourself,
– Rowan Williams (1950 - ), Holy Living

“The holiness of Jesus and the holiness of the church is something a great deal more than being ‘good’ or ‘virtuous’; it is being in the place where God through Christ makes peace between earth and heaven. It is being under the cross, in short. For a Christian to be holy is to be under the cross. A person may lead a deeply impressive moral life; they may even have a deeply impressive spiritual life, and yet if they don’t ‘live under the cross’, we can’t call them holy, in the biblical sense; and that living under the cross I first of all am acknowledging the unique and unrepeatable debt that we owe to the grace of God in the death of Jesus, living in gratitude for the gift given by Christ’s death and it is the seeking, day by day, to let that Cross live and work in us as we carry the cross in putting away our self-defending, self-justifying, self-protecting habits in every area of our lives. Holiness is living under the cross, the place where Jesus makes himself holy, so that we may be made Holy. It has all been done for us in the cross; God be praised; it is all, for each one of us to discover, day after day, in that self-emptying, that self-forgetting struggle to let Jesus live in us. No-one else, no other power, no other spirit.

So to be holy is to be found in the neighborhood of Christ’s cross. And that means that our holiness takes us where Jesus goes; our holiness takes us to those Jesus died for; it takes us into the neighborhood of those who are forgotten, who have no voice; those who need healing and forgiveness. It takes us into very strange places indeed and the holy person, as we all know, is often found in very odd company. The holy person, like Jesus himself, is to be found not among the righteous but among sinners, not among the healthy, but among the sick and a holy church is one that goes with its proclamation and integrity and its fidelity, among those who need healing - literally who need healing - those whose physical lives are wrecked by pain and disease and disaster.”
– Rowan Williams (1950 - ), One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church

“A deeper crisis in the workings and siftings of desire . . . Seen in such theological terms as these, the current crisis is about the failure in this Web-induced culture of instantly commodified desire, to submit all our desires to the test of divine longing. . . Is the 'right' to various pleasures superceded by the call to fidelity? Is my desire for wealth at the cost of Africa's ravaging ultimately disconnected from my assessment and testing of other desires, including sexual desires, before God? Thus to bind all one's desires 'into a tether' is to move beyond the false secular disjunction between 'libertinism' and 'repression', which is based on the presumption that freedom is found only by throwing off constraint. It is, in contrast, to re-glimpse a vision of 'freedom' obtained precisely by specific, freely chosen ascetic narrowings of choice, fuelled by prioritizing the love of God.”
– Sarah Coakley (1951 - ), The New Asceticism

“The double love of God and neighbor is not simple, sentimental, or easy. It requires self-denial. To love God requires us to know God – through the witness of the Bible, through worship and prayer, through the witness of tradition and the saints, and through the witness of creation. That also requires continual self-scrutiny lest we construct an image of God that suits us and then love the image we have formed for ourselves. To love our neighbor also requires that we actually come to know our neighbor. That too requires continual self-scrutiny to examine our own resistance to love and our tendency to project onto others what we already think they are or should be as characters of the story of our own making. The double love of God and neighbor requires taking up the cross and denying ourselves in order to be open to the Other (God) and the other (our neighbor).”
– Matthew Gunter (1957 - ) How I Came to Change My Mind on SSU: Part 4. Some Thoughts on Interpreting Scripture, An Odd Work of Grace: A Bishop’s Blog, Tuesday, May 26, 2015

“The first word for Christians is grace. The last word for Christians is grace. And every day, along the way, is grace, grace, grace. There is nothing we need do – or can do – to prove ourselves worthy of God’s gift of God’s love and God’s own self to us. It is freely given to be freely received. And it sets us free – free to orient ourselves toward the call of Jesus to take up the cross, deny ourselves and follow him in the way of self-sacrificing, self-giving love. In doing so, we find our truest self, our deepest joy, our most abundant life, and peace that passes understanding.”
– Matthew Gunter (1957 - )

“We renounce the spiritual forces that rebel against God, the, powers of this world, and our sinful desires. The ways of this world can be cruel and dehumanizing. And from time to time, we feel compelled to act on our self-centered interests and impulses Becoming a follower of Jesus does not insulate us from the world's destructive energies or exempt us from selfish impulses. Instead we commit ourselves to a lifelong pattern of resisting those unholy, dehumanizing forces and choosing to participate in God's grace. . . It's the ongoing day-to-day work of living in a fractured world that God is actively mending.”
– Jake Owensby (1957 - ), A full-Hearted Life

“The deepest word that can be spoken about sanctification is that it is a progress towards true humanity.”
– J. I. Packer (1926-2020), Rediscovering Holiness: Know the Fullness of Life with God

Previous:


Next:


Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Anglicanism is . . . 11. Committed to the Coinherence of all Humanity and all Creation

Like most Anglican commitments, this one goes deep into the early church. It only sound novel to us after some centuries of having our imaginations shaped by a way of reasoning that is reductive, materialistic, and disenchanting that looks at the rest of creation as a collection of things to be "objectively" studied and used rather than fellow creatures to be known and engaged with respect and reverence. Too often Christians have adopted that more recent way of understanding. We have sometimes forgotten if not denied that the world is charged with the grandeur of God and that everything and everyone is is woven together in relationship with God and each other. Denying that coinherence leads eventually to incoherence. Before we encounter anyone or anything, before we decide if they or it is "useful" to us, God is already is there, knowing and delighting. We are invited to share in that knowing and in that delighting. 

“Fountain of life and source of all goodness, you made all things and fill them with your blessing; you created them to rejoice in the splendor of your radiance.”
Book of Common Prayer (1979), Eucharist, Rite II, Prayer D

“God hath created nothing simply for itself, but each thing in all things, and every thing each part in other have such interest, that in the whole world nothing is found whereunto any thing that is created can say, ‘I need thee not.’”
– Richard Hooker (1554-1600), The Nature of Pride

“God is not so in any creature, nor any creature so in God, as Christ—whether we consider him as the personal Word of God, or as the natural Son of man. All other things that are of God nonetheless do have God in them, and he has them in himself. Yet because their substance and his wholly differ, their coherence and communion either with him or among themselves is in no way like that union between the Persons [of the Holy Trinity] discussed above.”
– Richard Hooker (1554-1600), Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity
 
“God is present by his essence; which, because it is infinite, cannot be contained within the limits of any place; and as the sun, reflecting upon the mud of strands and shores, is unpolluted in its beams, so is God not dishonored when we suppose him in every one of his creatures, and in every part of every one of them.”
– Jeremy Taylor (1613–1667), Holy Living

“No man is an island,
Entire of itself;
Every man is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.

If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less,
As well as if a promontory were:
As well as if a manor of thy friend's
Or of thine own were.

Any man's death diminishes me,
Because I am involved in mankind.
And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee.”
– John Donne (1572-1631), No Man is an Island
 
“The [intensity] whereby sometimes a man doteth upon one creature is but a little spark of that love, even towards all, that lurketh in his nature. We are made to love, both to satisfy the necessity of our active nature, and to answer the beauties in every creature. By Love our Souls are married and solder'd to the creatures and it is our Duty like God to be united to them all. We must love them infinitely, but in God, and for God and God in them: namely all His excellencies manifested in them. When we dote upon the perfections and beauties of some one creature, we do not love that too much, but other things too little. Never was anything in this world loved too much, but many things have been loved in a false way: and all in too short a measure..”
– Thomas Traherne (1636-1674), Centuries of Meditations
 
“That [humankind] is a community, that we all stand in a relation to each other, that there is a public end and interest of society which each particular is obliged to promote is the sum of morals.”
– Joseph Butler (1692-1752), Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel, Sermon IX. Upon Forgiveness of Injuries

“All mankind is one volume.
 – John Donne (1572-1631), Meditation XVII
 
“God has made us not to be separate creatures, but to have fellowship with one another. I believe He is working in these spirits of ours that we may have it. There is something which hinders us from having it. When we are bitter against each other that hinders it; when we are suspicious of each other that hinders it; when we think ourselves wiser or better than one another that hinders it. I believe the Spirit of God would take away these hindrances from us. Those from whom He takes them away are made saints or holy. I believe, then, in the Communion of Saints; in their Communion with the loving God and with His children.”
– F. D. Maurice (1805-1872), The Lord's Prayer, the Creed, and the Commandments

“We are always in the condition that we are because of others. . .
 
The Christian idea was expressed in the phrase bear ye one another’s burdens. It encouraged, indeed it demanded, a continual attention to the needs of one’s neighbor, to his [or her] distresses and his [or her] delights. And it defined ‘neighbor’ as meaning anyone with whom one was, by holy Luck, brought into contact. It required then, an active ‘sympathy,’ and it spoke of something still higher, of an active and nonselfish love. It went even farther. It declared a union of existences. It proclaimed that our own lives depended on the lives of our neighbors. Saint Anthony of Egypt laid down the doctrine in so many words: ‘Your life and your death are with your neighbor.’”
– Charles Williams (1886-1945), The Way of Exchange

“We are all limbs and parts of one Whole. Hence of each other.”
– C. S. Lewis (1898-1963), Till We Have Faces

“The word 'human' refers to something more than the bodily form or even the rational mind. It refers also to that community of blood and experience which unites all men and women on the Earth.”
 
“God promised to make you free. He never promised to make you independent.”
– Madeleine L
 Engle, (1918–2007), The Irrational Season

“I cannot but think that those who have detected this law of the imagination—this law of sympathy and communion between themselves and that which is distinct from them, have been assailed by a conviction which they cannot resist or part with, that some such Jaw of communion is the law of their whole life; that life is an unintelligible blank without it; that here must be the key to its deepest mysteries.”
– F. D. Maurice (1805-1872), The Kingdom of Christ
 
“God created us for fellowship. God created us so that we should form the human family, existing together because we were made for one another. We are not made for an exclusive self-sufficiency but for interdependence, and we break the law of our being at our peril.”
– Desmond Tutu (1931-2021), Nobel Peace Prize Lecture, December 11, 1984

“The first law of our being is that we are set in a delicate network of interdependence with our fellow human beings and with the rest of God’s creation. . . It is the essence of being human. It speaks of the fact that my humanity is caught up and inextricably bound up in yours. I am human because I belong. It speaks about wholeness; it speaks about compassion.”
– Desmond Tutu (1931-2021), God Has a Dream

The paradox, noted by a good many other commentators, is that our supposed materialism is actually a deeply anti-material thing. The plain thereness of the physical world we inhabit tells us from our first emergence into consciousness that our will is not the foundation of everything—and so its proper working is essentially about creative adjustment to an agenda set not by our fantasy but by the qualities and complexities of what we encounter. The material world tells us that to be human is to be in dialogue with what is other: what is physically other, what is humanly other in the solid three-dimensionality of other persons, ultimately what is divinely other. And in a world created by the God Christians believe in, this otherness is always communicating: meaning arises in this encounter, it is not devised by our ingenuity. 
 Rowan Williams (1950 - ), Embracing Our Limits, Commonweal, September 23, 2015

If you believe in a loving God who created all things and who wants to know and love all creatures in a relationship rooted in their freedom and willingness to participate, then we should expect that all human existence will be full of signposts, clues, and magnets toward the truth of God’s existence and love. Episcopalians believe that creation is embedded with clues and keys to seek and embrace God’s love. We are free to follow these natural and spiritual trails to their Creator, but we are not free to live in a world without them.
– Patricia Lyons, What Is Evangelism?

“Worship, in all its grades and kinds, is the response of the creature to the Eternal: nor need we limit this definition to the human sphere. There is a sense in which we may think of the whole life of the Universe, seen and unseen, conscious and unconscious, as an act of worship, glorifying its Origin, Sustainer, and End.”
– Evelyn Underhill (1875-1941), Worship
“First of all I don’t think the world is actually unenchanted. We are the ones who are failing to see what it is. So what I am interested in is not so much re-enchantment of the world as the undisenchantment of ourselves. Inside the word ‘enchantment’ is the word ‘chant’. In a sense, we have to hear the chant again. We have to tune our ears to it. But we have to chant in our turn. We have to make and shape the beautiful response to the beauty that we see. And that is part of reality.”
– Malcolm Guite (1957 - ), Malcolm Guite: We need to awaken the mind's attention, Re-Enchanting Podcast, Seen & Unseen Magazine

“[I]n God’s eternal knowing and loving of Godself, that is in the eternal begetting of the Word and breathing forth of the Spirit, God also knows and loves all the ways in which creatures might participate in the God’s life through God’s gift of each creature’s existence.

. . . Christians have understood the whole universe as the expression in time and space of God’s infinite activity of knowing and loving, that is, of God being the Trinity. This means there is a rich depth of intelligibility that rational creatures (humans and angels in particular) are all to apprehend and appreciate.; and it means there is an ultimate truth of all creatures, recoverable beyond all the world’s incoherence and violence―a living truth that is imperishably known and loved in God’s beloved Child from eternity, incarnate in Christ yet rejected by the world, and finally vindicated and brought to newness of life in Christ’s resurrection.”
– Mark McIntosh (1960-2021), The Divine Ideas Tradition

“Christ the Word incarnate, who bears within himself God’s eternal knowing and loving of every creature, draws the whole world to himself; in his dying sin’s mendacious and abusive grip on every creature is undone and, in his rising, the deep truth and goodness of every creature is vindicated and brought fully to life.”
– Mark McIntosh (1960-2021)The Divine Ideas Tradition

“The Christian community, desiring to share ever more fully in Christ’s dying and rising again, develops a new understanding of humanity’s contemplative calling―so that a continual conversion of contemplative consciousness collaborates in Christ’s re-harmonizing of creation with God’s knowing and loving of each creature.”
– Mark McIntosh (1960-2021), The Divine Ideas Tradition
 
Sin might be understood as the denial of coinherence and communion with God, all humanity, and the rest of creation:
 
“We see beneath all evil, beneath the universe itself, that eternal and original union of the Father and the Son . . . that union which was never fully manifested till the Only-begotten by the eternal spirit offered himself to God. The revelation of that primal unity is the revelation of the ground on which all things stand. It is the revelation of an order which sustains all the intercourse and society of men. It is the revelation of which sin has ever been seeking to destroy, and which at last has overcome sin. It is the revelation of that perfect harmony to which we look forward when all things are gathered up in Christ . . . when the law of sacrifice shall be the acknowledged law of all creation.”
– Frederick Denison Maurice (1805-1872), The Doctrine of Sacrifice Deduced from the Scriptures
 
“[Humans] desired to know schism in the universe.”
– Charles Williams (1886-1945), The Forgiveness of Sins
 
“They [Adam & Eve, Humanity] had refused the co-inherence of the original creation and had become (literally) incoherent in their suffering. He [God] proposed to make those sufferings themselves coinherent in him, and therefore to reintroduce them into the principle which was he.”
– Charles Williams (1886-1945), Natural Goodness

“We are being made aware that the organisation of society on the principle of private profit, as well as public destruction, is leading both to the deformation of humanity by unregulated industrialism, and to the exhaustion of natural resources, and that a good deal of our material progress is a progress for which succeeding generations may have to pay dearly. . . I would not have it thought that I condemn a society because of its material ruin, for that would be to make its material success a sufficient test of its excellence; I mean only that a wrong attitude towards nature implies, somewhere, a wrong attitude towards God, and that the consequence is an inevitable doom.”
– T. S. Elliot (1888-1965), The Idea of a Christian Society
 
“Like all the members of the community, we are all a mess of incoherent elements until the Holy Spirit calls us into roles and invites us into opportunities that resemble all our experiences and gifts in a beautiful way: and we trusting that our reassembling – a glimpse of the final reassembling of heaven – will be a blessing not just to ourselves but to all around us.”
– Sam Wells (1965 - ), Forward to Letters from Nazareth by Richard Carter

Previous: 


Next:


Saturday, April 18, 2026

Anglicanism is . . . 10. Committed to Belonging and to Being the Church as the Body of Christ

More so than some more Protestant church bodies, Anglicanism understands the divine-human drama to be centered not on the individual but on the community of the Church. While not strictly a matter of either/or, it does matter where we put the emphasis. By the Holy Spirit, God calls us into community where we learn to love one another as God loves us and empowers us to bear that love in the world. In, with and under that community, the Holy Spirit moves like an electric current empowering the Church to make our “life together a sign of Christ’s love to this sinful and broken world, that unity may overcome estrangement, forgiveness heal guilt, and joy conquer despair (Book of Common Prayer). 

The Holy Spirit not limited to the Church, of course. It blows where it will. But, wherever else it blows, we can count on it blowing through the baptized community that is the Church.

As the body of Christ the Church is, in a mystical sense, an extension of the Incarnation.

“The Spirit of Christ will be wanting in the heart that is shut up in selfishness”
– Henry Martyn (1781-1812), Journal and Letters of the Rev. Henry Martyn 

Individualism’ has no place in Christianity, and Christianity verily means its extinction.”
– Michael Ramsey (1904-1988), The Gospel and the Catholic Faith

“Christianity is a certain kind of personal belief and a certain kind of personal life; but it is not a merely individual religion, ‘a private matter between a man’s soul and God.’ It is membership, with all the responsibility of membership, in a society or brotherhood which Jesus Christ our Lord founded to bind together in one people of all classes and races and kinds. This society is the Holy Catholic Church, and the Church of England is a part of the catholic church.”
– Charles Gore (1853-1932), The Religion of the Church as Presented in the Church of England : a Manual of Membership

“Of course every person is an individual; but his individuality is what marks him off from others; it is a principle of division; whereas personality is social, and only in his social relationship can a man be a person. Indeed, for the completeness of personality, there is needed the relationship to both God and neighbours. The richer his personal relationships, the more fully personal he will be.”
– William Temple (1881-1944), Christianity and Social Order

“We realize the fullness of our own being only when we are conjoined in love to other beings, and gain our best hints of unity and completeness of life in sacred flashes when hearts and minds, retaining their separateness, through their very separation realize the mystery and miracle of fusion. Such flashes are rare and fugitive; it is possible that many people are never visited by them. But they are real, they do happen; and a suggestion is in them of the Divine interweavings wherein the full richness of Infinitude must abide.
– Vida Dutton Scudder (1861-1954), Social Teachings of the Christian Year

“I believe in a Church ; that is to say, in a body whom God has called out to testify of Him to men, to tell them of His holiness and truth, to assure them that death and the grave and Hell are not their Lords and Masters, to promise them that He would be with their hearts and spirits, guiding them out of lies into truth, out of evil into good. I believe in a Holy Church, that is a Church which is inspired by God's Holy Spirit; I believe in a Catholic Church, that is a Church for men of all kindreds and nations and tongues, a Church of which the Lord Jesus Christ is the only Head and Lord.”
– F. D. Maurice (1805-1872), The Lord's Prayer, the Creed, and the Commandments

“The Church is not a mere aggregation of believers, but is an organism welded into oneness by the indwelling Spirit.”
– Charles Grafton (1830-1912), Christian and Catholic

“The Holy Catholic Church is both logically and chronologically prior to its individual members with their individual experience. Christian doctrine knows nothing of an atomistic individualism. Though an intensely personal matter, faith is never a purely private matter.”
– J. S. Whale (1896-1997), Christian Doctrine

“Thus it must ever be with the working of the separatist principle in the Church. That principle tends inevitably to disintegration. One sect begets another, until gradually the original idea of a company of believers knit together in one organic body dies away, and nothing is left but the barren individualism, whose motto is ‘Every man for himself’.”
– William Reed Huntington (1838-1909), The Church-idea

“Men speak as if Christians came first and the Church after: as if the origin of the Church was in the wills of the individuals who composed it. But, on the contrary, throughout the teaching of the Apostles, we see it is the Church that comes first and the members of it afterwards ... In the New Testament ... the Kingdom of Heaven is already in existence, and men are invited into it. The Church takes its origin, not in the will of man, but in the will of the Lord Jesus Christ ... Everywhere men are called in: they do not come in and make the Church by coming. They are called into that which already exists: they are recognised as members when they are within; but their membership depends on their admission, and not upon their constituting themselves into a body in the sight of the Lord.”
– Frederick Temple (1821-1902), Catholicity and Individualism, quoted in Catholicity, A Study in the Conflict of Christian Traditions in the West Being a Report presented to His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury by a group of scholars including Dom Gregory Dix, T. S. Eliot, Austin Farrer, and Michael Ramsey
 
“Christ did not order or provide for any book to be circulated. He forbade our following any one person. ‘Call no man master.’ He endowed His Church with the Holy Spirit, making the Church thereby a living organism, through which He acts, gathering souls into His saving light and life. In the Church are to be found the Holy Scriptures and the sacraments. By the Church the Scriptures are preserved and interpreted to our enlightenment, and the sacraments are administered for our reception of life. We hear the voice of Christ speaking to us through the Church as guided by the Holy Spirit, it interprets the written word, and makes the truth known within us by our union with it.”
– Charles Grafton (1830-1912), Christian and Catholic
 
“For this primarily the Church exists: to be the Spirit-bearing body, and that is to be the bearer of Christ, the great ‘Christopher,’ perpetuating, in a new, but not less real way, the presence of the Son of man in the world.”
– Charles Gore (1853-1932), The Incarnation of the Son of God

“Christianity has always maintained that God incarnate, Jesus the Christ, inaugurated Christian community. Some maintain that he established it directly. Others hold, more plausibly, that he founded it indirectly. For them, church is the continuation of the mission that Jesus preached and enacted. This corporate activity, empowered by the Holy Spirit, makes Christ present in and as that community.”
– Scott MacDougall, Who Needs Church?, The Other Journal, Issue 37: Church , Spring 2024

“The commission given to the Church is that it carry out the purpose of God. That is what is meant by the description of it as ‘the Body of Christ’. It is to be the instrument or organ of His will, as His fleshly Body was in the days of His earthly ministry. That Body has many functions to fulfil, and one of them is suffering. The members of the Church do not, or should not, belong to it for what they can get in this world or in any other world; they – we – should belong to it in order to take our share in the great work, the fulfilment of God’s purpose in the world and beyond it.”
– William Temple (1881-1944), Christianity and Social Order

“The Church is the only institution that exists primarily for the benefit of those who are not its members.”
– William Temple (1881-1944), Attributed

“The Church (it was early decided) was not an organization of sinless men but of sinful, not a union of adepts but of less than neophytes, not of illuminati but of those that sat in darkness. Nevertheless, it carried within it an energy not its own, and it knew what it believed about that energy. It was the power of the Reconciler.”
– Charles Williams (1886-1945), He Came Down From Heaven
 
“While the New Testament emphasises the Catholic truth that the church is the extension of the Incarnation, it stresses also the vital importance of that Faith which is associated with the word Evangelical; for the Indwelling of Christ, which makes possible the Church, is linked to Faith in Him ‘Who loved me and gave Himself for me.’”
– Michael Ramsey (1904-1988), The Body of Christ - An Appeal to Anglo-Catholics in The English Catholic: the Quarterly Gazette of the Anglican Society (Summer 1928)
 
“The meaning of the Christian Church becomes most clear when it is studied in terms of the Death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.”
– Michael Ramsey (1904-1988), The Gospel and the Catholic Church
 
“The Christian community (the church militant) has been put here on earth not for self-nurture or nourishment but to exercise the painful, glorious work of reconciliation across the terrifying barriers erected all across our communal existences in this world.”
– Hans Frei (1922-1988), On the Thirty-Nine Articles in Unpublished Pieces: Transcripts from the Yale Divinity School archive edited by Mike Higton

“For his followers Jesus is the exact opposite of Humpty Dumpty. Not only is his broken life put together again in the resurrection, but each celebration of the Christian community is a re-membering of Christ, a putting together of the Christ who was broken and smashed. But in this re-membering, we become his members, his body, the extension of his incarnation and passion into human history. It is in this social experience that salvation is found. For salvation involves a participation in a new history, becoming members of a new community. We are not redeemed in isolation but as part of a redeemed community, a community brought into being by God’s strange work. When Christians meet together to break bread and share wine in his memory, they are taking part in an act which helps them to live. Through this act the distant figure from first-century Galilee and Jerusalem becomes a living presence and source of life.”
– Kenneth Leech (1939-2015), We Preach Christ Crucified

“The Church is itself the primary sacrament of Christ in human history. It is the sign of the union of all believers with God the Father, and at the same time it is the sign of the promise of the ultimate unity of the whole of humanity.
– Louis Weil (1935-2022), Sacraments & Liturgy, the Outward Signs

“The church is the community of the risen Christ. Christians affirm that the Church of Christ is one, holy, catholic, and apostolic. The church is the fruit of Gods redemptive mission through the incarnate Word (Romans 12:5; Galatians 3:26-28). The church is alive in its discernment of the mission of God and its participation in the mission of God.” 
Gods Church for Gods World: Reports, Addresses, and Calls of the Lambeth Conference, 2022 

“The church is God saying: ‘I’m throwing a banquet, and all these mismatched, messed-up people are invited. Here, have some wine.”
– Rachel Held Evans (1981-2019), Searching for Sunday: Loving, Leaving, and Finding the Church

“This is what God's kingdom is like: a bunch of outcasts and oddballs gathered at a table, not because they are rich or worthy or good, but because they are hungry, because they said yes. And there's always room for more.”
– Rachel Held Evans (1981-2019), Searching for Sunday: Loving, Leaving, and Finding the Church

“The church is the community of those who have been immersed in Jesus’ life, overwhelmed by it.”
– Rowan Williams (1950 - ), Tokens of Trust
 
“The Church is saying to the world, ‘he form of human community that's ultimately in accord with God’s purpose and God’s nature is one in which these principles apply: the principle of mutual enrichment when we receive the gifts of others, and see and meet the one another's needs, and the converse, the mutual impoverishment that happens when we forget or ignore the gift or the suffering of others.’ The Church says to the world, ‘this is the kind of community that makes God known; one that shows God's own nature and purpose. God’s nature as one who is beyond all partisanship, all self-interest, whose whole being is selflessness: that mystery which the doctrine of the Holy Trinity supremely reveals for us.
 
What that leads to is that every action in which that becomes real is, to use the language of a later generation, a kind of sacrament: an effective supernatural realization of God's nature and purpose within history. While we speak of the sacramental acts of the Church gathered for worship, I think that the Bible encourages us to believe that every action in which God's justice becomes manifest is also sacramental in the sense that it shows God's future. For us to be aware of that, to work and pray with it, is where the sacraments in the narrower sense become important. The community gathered around the Lord's Table is a sign of God's future.”
– Rowan Williams (1950 - ), No One Can Be Forgotten in God's Kingdom, a speech at the TEAM Conference in South Africa Friday 9th March 2007
 
“The Christian community, desiring to share ever more fully in Christ’s dying and rising again, develops a new understanding of humanity’s contemplative calling―so that a continual conversion of contemplative consciousness collaborates in Christ’s re-harmonizing of creation with God’s knowing and loving of each creature.”
– Mark McIntosh (1960-2021), The Divine Ideas Tradition
 
“In the Church, the mystical body of Christ, we have a yet further extension of the idea for which the lover of humanity cries. For the Church, both normally and ideally, includes the entire human race; even now, in a world invaded by sin and failure, it is the representative of all, the earnest of the society to be. It not only claims our service, but commands our reverence; for, made up as it is of faulty and distorted people, it yet reaches up into a higher region, and witnesses to perfection, through its organic and sacramental union with a Head in whom are centered holiness, wisdom, authority.”
– Vida Dutton Scudder (1861-1954), The Witness of Denial
 
The Church is essential, But Anglicans have no illusions of it being anything other than a treasure-bearing clay jar (2 Corinthians 4:7).
 
“Before Christians can say things about what the church ought to be, their first need is to say what the Church is, here and now amid its own failures and the questionings of the bewildered. Looking at it now, with its inconsistencies and perversions and its want of perfection, we must ask what is the real meaning of it just as it is. As the eye gazes upon it, it sees the Passion of Jesus Christ; but the eye of faith sees further: it sees the power of Almighty God.”
– Michael Ramsey (1904-1988), Glory Descending: Michael Ramsey and His Writings, ed. Douglas Dales
 
“Living in the Christian institution isn’t particularly easy. It is, generally, today, an anxious inefficient, pompous, evasive body. If you hold office on it, you become more and more conscious of what it’s doing to your soul. Think of what Coca-Cola does to your teeth. Why bother?

Well, because of the unwelcome conviction that it somehow tells the welcome truth about God, above all in its worship and sacraments. I don’t think I could put up with it for five minutes if I didn’t believe this.”
– Rowan Williams (1950 - ), No life, here – no joy, terror or tears, Church Times 17 July 1998
 
“We would like to imagine the Church striding through history like a hero or a saint. But, if we are honest, we must admit that the Church has ever staggered through history like the Whiskey Priest – all too often drunk on (worldly) power and sin, cowardly, less than faithful, self-interested, etc. But, while it has never been more than a Whiskey Priest, it has, by the grace of God, never been less. In spite of all its shortcomings, it has borne Word and Sacrament to the world. And it has also raised up exemplary saints – known and unknown. As with Graham Greene’s priest [in The Power and the Glory], we know that in spite of its shortcomings, the Spirit does not abandon the Church and God’s power and glory are present in and through it. But only and always by God’s grace, not its own heroic or saintly purity.

And there’s the rub. The compulsion and presumption to create a pure Church, whether that be pure in holiness or pure in teaching or pure in justice – however and by whomever any of those is defined – is rooted in either pride or impatience (or both). If we continually expect and demand that the Church stride through history like a hero-saint we will continually be frustrated by its actual plodding through history like a Whiskey Priest. But we will also miss the opportunity to learn what it means to live by God’s power and glory rather than our own. We will miss the fact of God’s sheer grace. I wonder if the refusal to accept and love the Church as a ‘corpus permixtum’ – a mixed body of sinners and saints – is not rooted in our own unwillingness to see ourselves as ‘simul justus et peccator – simultaneously righteous and sinful. We only ever live under the Mercy.”
– Matthew Gunter (1957 - ), Whiskey Priest Church, An Odd Work of Grace blog, July 4, 2015
 
“It is almost too obvious that the church reflects both the very best and the very worst of us, for, – whatever else it is – it is composed of human beings. And human beings are sometimes hopeful, sometimes seek after petty forms of power, and sometimes are mobilized into the most remarkable sacrificial acts. . . as furious as I get, the church – in all its hypocrisy, human cravenous, and prejudice – remains a place of grace. And remains a place of grace because God is bizarrely and wonderfully passionate about the freaks, the half-mad, the second-rate, and yet glorious bunch that we – the church – are. And if God can still value the loons within it (including me), then so can I.”
– Rachel Mann (1970 - ), Dazzling Darkness
 
“In spite of the various faults which at any time disfigure the Church, we also see from time to time what might be called ‘gleams of glory,’ moments when the ideal nature of the Church, its true nature, shines out.”
– John Macquarrie (1919-2007), Starting from Scratch

Anglicanism is international

Anglicans belong to the Anglican Communion, comprised of 42 autonomous provincial churches and over 80 million members across 160+ countries. It is united by shared historic Anglican tradition and worship, mutual recognition and fellowship rather than a central authority. The Archbishop of Canterbury serves as spiritual leader and focus of communion. The Anglican Communion is a reminder that to be a Christian is not an individual affair. It is to be a member of the body of Christ, the Church. It is to be bound to allegiances that transcend national boundaries as well as other loyalties. Members of the Anglican Communion are fundamentally united to other members of the Communion around the globe by a common heritage of faith, by bonds of affection, and by the water of baptism which is thicker than blood. We belong to one another.

The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, otherwise known as The Episcopal Church (which name is hereby recognized as also designating the Church), is a constituent member of the Anglican Communion, a Fellowship within the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, of those duly constituted Dioceses, Provinces, and regional Churches in communion with the See of Canterbury, upholding and propagating the historic Faith and Order as set forth in the Book of Common Prayer.
Preamble of the Constitution of the The Episcopal Church

Previous:


Next:


Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Anglicanism is . . . 9. Incarnational

Anglicans believe in the necessity of the Passion of Jesus Christ for our redemption. The cross is essential. As is the Resurrection. But Anglicanism has tended to focus on the Incarnation – God taking on human flesh, human reality, and indeed, material reality more generally – as being itself salvific. The emphasis on sacramentalism in the last post is grounded in the Incarnation.

“Not having, as did the Continental Reformers, a preoccupation with the doctrines of justification or predestination they [Anglicans in the century after the Reformation] followed the Fathers of the Nicene age in treating the Incarnation as the central doctrine of the faith. Indeed a feeling of the centrality of the Incarnation became a recurring feature of Anglican divinity, albeit the Incarnation was seen as St. Athanasius saw it in its deeply redemptive aspect.”
– Michael Ramsey (1904-1988), The Ancient Fathers and Modern Anglican Theology, Sobornost, Winter-Spring 1962

“Every thing, which God would ever do, must have been unchangeably present to the Divine Mind. To think of the Incarnation, as only a remedy for Adam’s fall, is to imagine changeableness in God. There can be no afterthought in God. God must have eternally known and provided for it. The All-Holy Soul of Jesus must ever have been the Object of his choice. It must have been the centre of His Creation, the Primal conception of His Mind, when He willed to put in act what He ever had in mind. The central idea of His Mind, that, wherein things in heaven and things in earth were to be united, was a Human Soul.”
– Edward Bouverie Pusey (1800-1882), Eleven Addresses during a Retreat of the Companions of the Love of Jesus, Adress III. ‘God’s Love for each soul in the Incarnation’
 
“What does the Church think of Christ? The Church’s answer is categorical and uncompromising, and it is this: That Jesus Bar-Joseph, the carpenter from Nazareth, was in fact and in truth, and in the most exact and literal sense of the words, the God ‘by whom all things were made.’ His body and brain were those of a common man; his personality was the personality of God, so far as that personality could be expressed in human terms. He was not a kind of demon pretending to be human; he was in every respect a genuine living man. He was not merely a man so good as to be ‘like God’—he was God.
 
Now, this is not just a pious commonplace: it is not a commonplace at all. For what it means is this, among other things: that for whatever reason God chose to make man as he is—limited and suffering and subject to sorrows and death—[God] had the honesty and courage to take his own medicine. Whatever game he is playing with his creation, he has kept his own rules and played fair. He can exact nothing from man that he has not exacted from himself. He has himself gone through the whole of human experience, from the trivial irritations of family life and the cramping restrictions of hard work and lack of money to the worst horrors of pain and humiliation, defeat, despair, and death. When he was a man, he played the man. He was born in poverty and died in disgrace and thought it well worthwhile.”
– Dorothy Sayers (1893-1957) The Greatest Drama Ever Staged, from ‘The Whimsical Christian’
 
“God does not give us explanations; we do not comprehend the world, and we are not going to. It is, and it remains for us, a confused mystery of bright and dark. God does not give us explanations; he gives us a Son. Such is the spirit of the angel’s message to the shepherds: ‘Peace upon earth, good will to men . . . and this shall be the sign unto you: ye shall find a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, and lying in a manger.’
 
The Word of God brings upon human pain and strife the consolation of eternal love.”
– Austin Farrer (1904-1968), The Essential Sermons

“What I believe is so magnificent, so glorious, that it is beyond finite comprehension. To believe that the universe was created by a purposeful, benign Creator is one thing. To believe that this Creator took on human vesture, accepted death and mortality, was tempted, betrayed, broken, and all for love of us, defies reason. It is so wild that it terrifies some Christians who try to dogmatize their fear by lashing out at other Christians, because tidy Christianity with all answers given is easier than one which reaches out to the wild wonder of God’s love, a love we don’t even have to earn.”
– Madeleine L’Engle (1918–2007), Penguins and Golden Calves

“A teacher of small children told us of a child who said to her, 'Jesus is God's show and tell.'

How simple and how wonderful! Jesus is God's show and tell. That's the best theology of incarnation I've ever heard. Jesus said, if you do not understand me as a little child, you will not be able to enter the kingdom of heaven.”
– Madeleine L’Engle, Glimpses of Grace
 
“In Athanasius’ words, ‘He became man that we might become divine,’ so that we might share in the life of God and consequently that the life of God might be in him. Yet the Redeemer is not a gnostic Christ imparting the secrets of divine wisdom, who could indeed be a heavenly figure in human disguise. The mystery of our redemption is something altogether deeper than that. It proceeds, not from the outside by illumination, but from the inside by participation. We need transformation, not information.”
– John Polkinghorne (1930-2021), The Faith of a Physicist
 
“God’s love has no bounds. It seeks to preserve the integrity and goodness of all creation regardless of how far God must reach down into the constructs of human hate to do so. The freedom of God that is expressed in life is always connected to love. It is God’s very love for life that serves as the motivating force for all that God does. Because of God’s love for creation, God has entered into human history. God’s very movement in human history is defined by the love of God.”
– Kelly Brown Douglas (1957 - ), Stand Your Ground: Black Bodies and the Justice of God
 
“The stupendous theme [of Christianity is] that God’s ultimate purpose for the human race and for the whole material universe is that they should be taken up into Christ and transformed into a condition of unimaginable glory, and that it is for this that God took our human nature, in which spirit and matter are so mysteriously and intricately interwoven.”
– E. L. Mascall (1905-1993), The Christian Universe
 
“United with Christ our humanity is purified, healed and elevated—saved from sin and its effects (anxiety, fear, conflict and death)—as a consequence of the very incarnation through which the life-giving powers of God’s own nature are brought to bear on human life in the predicament of sin. Humanity is taken to the Word in the incarnation in order to receive from the Word what saves it.”
– Kathryn Tanner (1957 - ), Christ the Key
 
“Humanity is humanity suffering from fear and distress, conflict with others, anxiety before death, betrayal and isolation, separation from God—all the qualities of death-infused, sin-corrupted life that require remedy. The cross then typifies the character of human life that the Word becomes incarnate to reverse by making its own; incarnation does not distract attention from the cross but sees all the struggles of Jesus life as the Word made flesh in light of it.”
– Kathryn Tanner (1957 - ), Christ the Key
 
“How can I matter to him? we say. It makes no sense; he has the world, and even that he does not need. It is folly even to imagine him like myself, to credit him with eyes into which I could ever look, a heart that could ever beat for my sorrows or joys, and a hand he could hold out to me. For even if the childish picture be allowed, that hand must be cupped to hold the universe, and I am a speck of dust on the star-dust of the world.
 
Yet Mary holds her finger out, and a divine hand closes on it. The maker of the world is born a begging child; he begs for milk, and does not know that it is milk for which he begs. We will not lift our hands to pull the love of God down to us, but he lifts his hands to pull human compassion down upon his cradle. So the weakness of God proves stronger than men, and the folly of God proves wiser than men. Love is the strongest instrument of omnipotence, for accomplishing those tasks he cares most dearly to perform; and this is how he brings his love to bear on human pride; by weakness not by strength, by need and not by bounty.”
– Austin Farrer (1904-1968), A Faith of Our Own

“There is a phrase associated with two of the greatest Anglican thinkers of the last generation, Michael Ramsey and John V. Taylor: ‘God is Christlike and in him there is no unChristlikeness at all'. What is seen in Jesus is what God is; what God is is the outpouring and returning of selfless love, which is the very essence of God’s definition, in so far as we can ever speak of a ‘definition’ of the mystery.”
– Rowan Williams (1950 - ), Tokens of Trust
 
“Christ has taken humanity to himself, and so every man and woman and child in the world is loveable and infinitely precious. And, in response, men and women can treat each other–whatever their race or color–in the light of Bethlehem; or they can, in rejecting the human dignity of their fellows, reject their own dignity too.”
– Michael Ramsey (1904-1988), Through the Year with Michael Ramsey, Margaret Duggan, ed.
 
“One of the most convicting aspects of Christianity, if we try to see it in terms of our own day, is the contrast between its homely and inconspicuous beginnings and the holy powers it brought into the world. It keeps us in perpetual dread of despising small things, humble people, little groups. The Incarnation means that the Eternal God enters our common human life with all the energy of His creative love, to transform it, to exhibit to us its riches, its unguessed significance; speaking our language, and showing us His secret beauty on our own scale.”
– Evelyn Underhill (1875-1941), The School of Charity
 
“It was human nature, not a human person, that God the Son united to himself when he became man. Thus, both the state of fallenness and the state of redemption appertain in the first place to the human race as such, and then to individual men and women as members of it; and this does not mean that God is not interested in us as individuals, but that he is interested in us as the kind of individuals we are, namely members of one another.”
– E. L. Mascall (1905-1993), The Christian Universe
 
“The Only-Begotten, having shone upon us from the very Essence of God the Father, and having in His own Nature all which the Father is, became Flesh according to the Scriptures, having, as it were, mingled Himself with our nature, through the ineffable concurrence and union with this body which is from the earth. Thus He, by nature God, was truly called and became a Heavenly Man (not ‘bearing God,’ as some say who do not accurately understand the depth of the mystery, but) being, in one, God and Man, that having, in a manner, co-united in Himself what by nature was far apart and alien from all sameness of nature, He might make man to communicate in and partake of the Divine Nature.”
– Edward Bouverie Pusey (1800-1882), Eirenicon

“Christ, . . . the Incarnate Word, Son of God, and Son of Man, is Himself in a most true sense the Gospel.

Viewed in this light the Gospel of the Word become flesh brings such an answer as we need, and as we are able to receive, to the riddles of life which widening experience proposes to us, We readily admit that we are not able to grasp completely or to systematise exactly the whole Truth which is presented to us. But we can see, with sufficient clearness to gain confidence in our work, that it throws light on the darkest mysteries of self and the world and God.”
– Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901), The Gospel of Life: Thoughts Introductory to the Study of Christian Doctrine

“Father, you loved the world so much that in the fullness of time you sent your only Son to be our Savior. Incarnate by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, he lived as one of us, yet without sin. To the poor he proclaimed the good news of salvation; to prisoners, freedom; to the sorrowful, joy. To fulfill your purpose he gave himself up to death; and, rising from the grave, destroyed death, and made the whole creation new.”
Book of Common Prayer (1979), Eucharist, Rite II, Prayer D