“For if you forgive others their trespasses, your
heavenly Father will also forgive you; but if you do not forgive others,
neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” – Jesus (Matthew 6:14-15)
Then Peter came and said to him, “Lord, if another
member of the church sins against me, how often should I forgive? As many as
seven times?’” Jesus said to him, “Not seven times, but, I tell you,
seventy-seven times.” – Jesus (Matthew 18:21-22)
In the last post about mercy, we saw that God's mercy is comprehensive and that being a follower of Jesus means extending that mercy to all others. Among other things, that means a call to a radical discipline of forgiveness. (In addition to the above, see Matthew 18:33-35, Mark 11:25, Luke 6:37-38, Colossians 3:12-13)
In the last post about mercy, we saw that God's mercy is comprehensive and that being a follower of Jesus means extending that mercy to all others. Among other things, that means a call to a radical discipline of forgiveness. (In addition to the above, see Matthew 18:33-35, Mark 11:25, Luke 6:37-38, Colossians 3:12-13)
Charles Williams (1886-1945) was a member of the
Inklings, the literary discussion group that included J. R.R. Tolkien and C. S
Lewis. He is a favorite of mine. He was an editor and authored several strange,
but wonderful “supernatural thrillers”. He was also a lay theologian – mostly
self-taught, idiosyncratic, but orthodox. He wrote several theological books
and essays. His writing style is not always easy to follow, but what he has to
say is almost always wise, evocative, and worth the trouble.
The following is from Williams’ book, The Forgiveness of Sins, which he dedicated to the Inklings. It was originally part
of a series of books that included The Problem of Pain by C. S. Lewis. It was
published in 1942, in the thick of World War II. The point he makes is no less
challenging or pertinent for Christians today:
Forgiveness is not
normally a thrilling or an exciting thing. The metaphor which our Lord used has
a particular aptness--it is the taking up, the carrying, the Cross, not the
being crucified: it is the intolerable weight of the duty, and not its agony,
which defeats us--'the weight of glory'. – p. 192-193
. . . .
Forgiveness of all
injuries is demanded of the Christian because of the nature of our Lord, and it
is demanded entirely. The phrase ‘things that cannot be forgiven’ is therefore
to him intellectually meaningless. But it may in fact mean a good deal all the
same. It is true that few of us are, fortunately, in a position to understand
that meaning; no injuries of which the forgiveness seem unbelievable have ever
been done to us. But probably there are at the present moment more persons
alive in Europe than for many generations to whom such injuries have been done.
. . . The massacres, the tortures, and the slavery, which have appeared in
Europe of late that have impressed themselves upon us. In the ruined homes of
Rotterdam–or indeed of England–among the oppressed thousands of Poland, there
are those to whom the phrase ‘things that cannot be forgiven’ has fearful
meaning. Must they nevertheless be forgiven? They must. Must vengeance, must
even resentment, be put off? It must. There is certainly a distinction between
the desire for private vengeance and the execution of public justice. But there
is no excuse for concealing private vengeance under the disguise of public
justice. . . .The injury done to many in this kind of war is greater than the
injury done to one in private, but the result, from a Christian point of view,
cannot be other. That must be, everywhere and always, the renewal of love. But
in such states as we are now considering, that renewal means little less than
heroic sanctity. It is upon such heroic sanctities that the Church
depends–depends in the sense that they are the rule, its energy, and its great
examples. . .
Heroic sanctity is required perhaps to forgive,
but not to forgive is ordinary sin. There is no alternative; the greatness of
the injury cannot supply that. It becomes–an excuse? No, a temptation: the
greater the injury, the greater the temptation; the more excusable the sin, the
no less sin. – p. 165-167
. . . .
Many reconciliations have unfortunately broken
down because both parties have come prepared to forgive and unprepared to be
forgiven. Instruction is as badly needed in this as in many other less vital
things; that holy light which we call humility has an exact power of
illumination all its own. – p. 193
How often do I make excuses for my hardness of heart and weakness of will? How often to I give in to the temptation not to forgive? How often do I refuse to acknowledge that I am the one in need of forgiveness? How often does my mercy fall far short of the mercy of God?
Becoming a People of God's Mercy and Delight, Part 1
Becoming a People of God's Mercy and Delight, Part 2
More Mercy and Delight
Becoming a People of God's Mercy and Delight, Part 1
Becoming a People of God's Mercy and Delight, Part 2
More Mercy and Delight
No comments:
Post a Comment