There
was once a baseball game between Team A and Team B. Team A had an extensive
Spring Training. Team B, on the other hand, was made up of players who had
never been allowed to play the game and were not allowed Spring Training or any
other practice before the game.
In
the first three innings, Team A had all the latest equipment while Team B had no mitts and no cleats on their shoes. Furthermore, when they were at
bat, Team B was only allowed two strikes, while Team A was allowed the
customary three. No walks were granted Team B for any reason. The umpires were hired and paid for by Team A and were overtly biased in their favor. The strike zone was much more generous for Team A’s pitchers. Close calls and calls that were not even close went against team B. And any time a Team B
player hit a home run, he was ejected as soon as he crossed home plate. And any
Team B player who complained about any of this was also ejected.
After
three innings the score was Team A: 32, Team B: 3.
Before
the fourth inning, each team got all new players. But the score remained. Team
B received acquired gloves but still no shoes with cleats. Team B batters could
earn a walk after six balls but not if the batter was hit by a pitch. And Team A pitchers regularly aimed pitches at Team B batters. The
umpires were still paid for by Team A and heavily and obviously biased in its favor. Team B batters
were no longer automatically ejected for hitting a home run but any Team B
player who complained about a bad call was ejected.
After
six innings the score was Team A: 51, Team B: 14.
Before
the seventh inning the players for each team were again replaced by new
players. But the score still carried over. Now both teams had access more or
less to the same equipment. and the rules were the same for each. But the
officials still seemed to favor Team A.
At
the end of the eighth inning the score was Team A: 62, Team B: 19. The players
of Team B again protested the uneven score and the bias of the umpires. The
current players of Team A responded, “Why are you complaining? None of us was
playing during the first six innings. It’s not our fault the score is so
uneven.” And, “It’s not like a close call never
goes against our players. We don’t believe the officiating is all that unfair. In any event, we’ve
had to earn every run we have scored.” And, “Sure, Team B players matter. But all players matter. After all, at the
end of the day, we’re all playing for the same league.” But the score remains unfairly lopsided and the biased officiating continues.
I
am sure this analogy can be improved one way or another (feel free to offer
suggestions). It does not, for example, capture the real physical, emotional, and psychological violence of racism. But I hope it gets at the reality that for generations the deck
has been stacked, often violently, against one “team”. From Jim Crow and
lynching, to Red Lining and unequal access to the G. I. Bill, to unfair
policing and courts, Black Americans have had multiple, often deliberate, obstacles
placed between them and success.
Many of the most egregious these injustices continued well into my lifetime. Even the history is recent history. It is undeniable that this has led to exiting inequities in opportunity and the accumulation of wealth. Playing with the analogy a bit more, one can acknowledge that not every player on each team is equally talented or has put in the same individual effort but the fact remains that we are in a situation in which one team has had and continues to have unfair advantages resulting from a history of inequality and abuse. And it is not all past.
Many of the most egregious these injustices continued well into my lifetime. Even the history is recent history. It is undeniable that this has led to exiting inequities in opportunity and the accumulation of wealth. Playing with the analogy a bit more, one can acknowledge that not every player on each team is equally talented or has put in the same individual effort but the fact remains that we are in a situation in which one team has had and continues to have unfair advantages resulting from a history of inequality and abuse. And it is not all past.
I don’t have a simple
solution to address or redress all the resulting disparities. But a place to begin is
for members of “Team A” – White Americans – to acknowledge the disparity and
recognize that we benefit from the score having been run up even before we
entered the game. At the very least we can begin with the officiating.
Here
is a brief video laying out the actual history the above analogy attempts to
portray:
No comments:
Post a Comment